P. v. Elwood CA4/3
Dustin James Elwood and Jimmy Ernest Hutton appeal from judgments after a jury convicted them of numerous sexual offenses. Elwood argues the trial court erred by excluding evidence the victims previously engaged in sexual activity and made false allegations of molestation, and he requests we independently review the victims’ school records. Hutton contends insufficient evidence supports one of his convictions and the court erred in instructing the jury. Elwood and Hutton join in each other’s arguments where applicable. None of their contentions have merit, and we affirm the judgments.
Comments on P. v. Elwood CA4/3