Warner v. Carson CA6
Defendant Fletcher Carson appeals from a judgment after a jury trial in a residential unlawful detainer action. His landlord sued him for unlawful detainer after he failed to pay $28,000 in rent, and Carson defended by asserting that the house was uninhabitable and the eviction was in retaliation for complaints he made about the condition of the premises. The jury rejected those defenses and found in favor of the landlord. Carson contends the judgment should be reversed because the special verdict form was defective and there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict. For the reasons explained, we will affirm.
Comments on Warner v. Carson CA6