legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re B.B. CA2/8
Amy B. (mother) and Jeremy B. (father) appeal a judgment declaring their 13-year-old daughter and 12-year-old son dependents of the court, and removing them from their parents’ care. Mother and father contend that the state of Washington was the children’s home state when this case began, and the juvenile court did not properly exercise emergency or continuing jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA; Fam. Code, § 3400 et seq.). We conclude the court properly exercised emergency jurisdiction over the children under the act, but remand the matter to the juvenile court to allow it to contact and provide notice to Washington authorities. If a Washington court declines to exercise jurisdiction, the jurisdictional and dispositional orders will remain in effect. If a Washington court initiates proceedings, the juvenile court is directed to void its jurisdictional and dispositional orders, and proceed in compliance with the UCCJEA.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale