Barker v. Aminirad CA2/3
This action stems from a car accident between defendant and appellant Roxanna Aminirad and plaintiff and respondent Nathan Barker, who was injured. Aminirad admitted liability, and the matter was tried to a jury on causation and damages. The jury awarded damages to Barker. Aminirad appeals, and Barker cross-appeals. In her appeal, Aminirad contends that the trial court improperly excluded expert testimony about causation, that she was deprived of a fair trial because insurance was mentioned, and that an award of future medical damages was improper. In his cross-appeal, Barker contends that the trial court improperly taxed costs. We affirm.
Comments on Barker v. Aminirad CA2/3