P. v. Munoz CA2/1
Marcos Munoz appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction for first degree murder, with firearm and gang enhancements, contending the trial court violated his constitutional right to due process by allowing the prosecution to admit hearsay evidence, and insufficient evidence supported the gang enhancement finding. We conclude the trial court erred in admitting hearsay but the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We reject Munoz’s contention that the gang enhancement was unfounded. Therefore, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Munoz CA2/1