V.S. v. A.C. CA4/2
In his briefing in this family law matter, plaintiff and appellant V.S. (father) describes himself as “an indigent and incarcerated pro per litigant.” He appeals from a minute order, dated November 18, 2015, awarding sole physical and legal custody of his son A.S. (child) (born August 2004) to the child’s mother, defendant and respondent A.C. (mother), and providing that father is to have “visitation/contact with the minor child at the minor child’s discretion.” Father contends that the trial court erred in a number of respects, including: (1) failing to appoint counsel to represent him; (2) denying his motion pursuant to Family Code section 7605, to require mother to pay for an attorney for father; (3) denying his request for a continuance; (4) proceeding to consider the matter in his absence; (5) finding him to be a natural father, but not a presumed father, of the child; (6) depriving him joint legal custody without making a finding of detriment; and (7) delegating d
Comments on V.S. v. A.C. CA4/2