P. v. Ramirez CA5
Appellant George Ramirez contends the trial court erred when it denied his motion to quash and traverse a search warrant without first conducting an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware (1978) 438 U.S. 154 (Franks). He contends the case must be remanded for the trial court to conduct a Franks hearing. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ramirez CA5