P. v. Cupp CA2/4
Defendant Ronald Vernon Cupp appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of ten violations of attempting to record a false or forged document (Pen. Code, § 115, subd. (a) (§ 115(a)) and five counts of forgery (§ 470, subd. (d) (§ 470(d)). He contends his conduct could be prosecuted exclusively under section 115(a) because it is more specific than section 470(d), and that his convictions for forgery should therefore be reversed. We shall affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Cupp CA2/4