Marriage of Hoff CA3
James (Jim) Hoff appeals from a judgment on reserved issues in this marital dissolution proceeding. Jim’s primary argument on appeal is that an earlier “partial judgment” limited the superior court’s jurisdiction over the issues remaining for trial and the court exceeded its jurisdiction by deciding those issues on grounds that were not specifically reserved in the “partial judgment.” We disagree and affirm the judgment. We do not, however, find the appeal so egregious as to warrant the imposition of sanctions. Therefore, we deny respondent Sharon Hoff’s motion for sanctions.
Comments on Marriage of Hoff CA3