Anderson v. State Personnel Board CA3
Plaintiff and appellant Adam Anderson challenges the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of mandate to set aside the decision of defendant State Personnel Board (the Board) sustaining the termination of his employment by real party in interest and respondent California Department of Developmental Services (the Department). Anderson claims the trial court abused its discretion in denying his writ petition because its findings are not supported by the evidence and the penalty imposed is grossly disproportionate. We shall affirm the judgment.
Comments on Anderson v. State Personnel Board CA3