legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Chaidez CA4/1
Roberto Chaidez appeals from orders denying his requests for resentencing under Proposition 36 (Pen. Code, § 1170.126) and Proposition 47 (§ 1170.18, subd. (a)).
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 2006 a jury convicted Roberto Chaidez of two counts of residential burglary of an inhabited dwelling (§§ 459, 460); receiving stolen property (§ 496); and unlawfully taking and driving a motor vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851). In bifurcated proceedings, the jury found true special allegations that Chaidez had incurred two prior felony convictions (§§ 667, subd. (a), 668, 1192.7, subd. (c)); two strike priors (§§ 667, subd. (b)-(i), 668, 1170.12); and three prior prison terms (§§ 667.5, subd. (b), 668). The court sentenced Chaidez to 60 years to life. (§ 654.) (People v. Chaidez (Sept. 10, 2008, D049656) [nonpub. opn.] (Chaidez).)

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale