legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re G.S. CA6
Ro.S. is the father of G.S. and Re.S., the children at issue in this dependency matter. The father appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional orders after the children were declared dependent minors under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300. The father contends the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Alternatively, he challenges a dispositional order requiring him to “develop a network” of family, friends, and/or professionals to help him create a plan “to show everyone” that he can provide adequate supervision for the children.
For reasons that we will explain, we will modify the challenged dispositional order and affirm the juvenile court’s orders as modified.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale