legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Yiu CA1/4
Appellant Marina Yiu appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress both evidence found at the time of her arrest and her post-arrest custodial statement. She argues that her landlord and co-resident could not consent to allow officers to enter and arrest her within her rented bedroom for the crime of vandalizing cars. We conclude that the officers did not have consent to enter Yiu’s bedroom, but even if the car keys found in her jacket at the time of her arrest should have been suppressed, any error in admitting the keys at trial was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We further conclude the officers did have probable cause to arrest Yiu, so her subsequent Mirandized statement was admissible at trial. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale