In re A.G.
In this second appeal, Mother contends: (1) the court erroneously denied her section 388 petition seeking to have A.G. placed with paternal relatives by considering A.G.'s current circumstances rather than circumstances as they existed at the original section 388 hearing; (2) even if the court could consider current circumstances, it abused its discretion by denying Suzanne's request to have A.G. placed with paternal relatives; and (3) the evidence supported a finding the beneficial parent-child relationship exception applied to preclude terminating Suzanne's parental rights. Marvin also appeals, joining in Suzanne's first two arguments and specifically asserting the court erred by failing to consider all the factors set forth in section 361.3 for relative placement. The court affirmed the judgment.
Comments on In re A.G.