Marriage of Escobedo
Reggie’s briefs on appeal, filed in pro per, raise issues regarding the trial court’s characterization of the real property owned by the parties, the award of a timeshare to Kathleen, the termination of Kathleen’s obligation to pay Reggie spousal support, the order requiring him to return to work, the failure of the trial court to find any misappropriation of funds or property by Kathleen, and an order granting an ex parte motion brought by Kathleen at the time of the custody trial. Reggie’s opening brief also contains headings concerning a “Subaru Loan,” Kathleen’s “Declaration of Disclosure,” “Lying/Perjury,” and “Inadequate Representation.” In his reply brief, Reggie requests additional relief regarding venue, custody, and reimbursement for community contributions to Kathleen’s education. Judgment Affirmed.
Comments on Marriage of Escobedo