legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.F. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant, J.S. (father), challenges the juvenile court’s termination of his parental rights over his daughter, N.F. Father contends the court erred because the only obstacle to placing N.F. in his care was his poverty-based lack of housing. Father maintains that the court’s severance of the parent-child relationship based on poverty violated his right to due process. In addition, he argues the court misapplied the parental benefit exception to adoption by reading a requirement of day-to-day contact into the exception. Defendant and appellant, S.Y. (mother), for her part, maintains that if we reverse the termination of father’s parental rights, we must also reverse the termination of her rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale