In re A.H. CA4/3
L.H. (father) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to prove the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings. He also contends the court erred by not placing the children with him and reducing his visitation, and Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) did not provide him with adequate housing assistance.
P.R. (mother) did not appeal, and father acknowledges minors will remain dependent children of the juvenile court regardless of the disposition of his appeal. (In re Alysha S. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 393, 397.) We review the court’s orders and findings because they could have other negative consequences for father. (In re Drake M. (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 754, 762-763.) However, we find none of father’s arguments persuasive and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re A.H. CA4/3