legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jasmine B.
Appellant appeals from the order terminating her parental rights to her children, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Appellant contends (1) insufficient evidence supports the juvenile court’s finding that the children were adoptable; (2) the children’s counsel was an ineffective advocate for their well-being; (3) the juvenile court abused its discretion by granting the legal guardian complete discretion to determine whether court-ordered visits took place; and (4) the court’s delegation of judicial authority over visits to the legal guardian violated appellant’s right to due process and corrupted the findings and orders entered at the section 366.26 hearing. Appellantfailed to substantiate or waived these contentions. Court affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale