In re M.H. CA3
A.A. (mother) appeals from the findings and orders made by the juvenile court at the combined jurisdictional/dispositional hearing concerning her minor child M.H. Mother contends there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s jurisdictional finding under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b)(1). (Unless otherwise set forth, statutory section references that follow are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Mother further contends the juvenile court erred in assuming jurisdiction over the minor because father was adequately caring for him and there was no need for the juvenile court to continue to supervise him. We affirm the judgment (orders).
Comments on In re M.H. CA3