legal news


Register | Forgot Password

T.D. Services Co. v. Ewing CA4/1
In this case a judgment creditor timely filed an application to extend the enforceability of his judgment under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 683.110 et seq.; the judgment debtor moved to vacate the extension under section 683.170, and the trial court denied his motion.
We affirm. The judgment debtor did not establish any grounds for denying enforcement of the judgment within the meaning of section 683.170, and hence the trial court did not err in denying his motion. In particular, the judgment debtor failed to show the judgment creditor was the party to any subsequent settlement, which discharged the judgment. The fact that the amount of the extended judgment was smaller than what he owed did not prejudice the judgment debtor. We also reject the judgment debtor's claim that extension of the judgment was barred by the doctrine of laches.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale