P. v. Foster CA2/7
Following a suitability hearing under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012, enacted by the voters as Proposition 36 (Pen. Code, § 1170.126), the trial court found resentencing Michael L. Foster would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety and denied his petition for recall of his prison sentence. On appeal Foster contends he was provided ineffective assistance of counsel and the trial court failed to apply the proper definition of “unreasonable risk of danger to public safety.” We affirm the trial court’s order.
Comments on P. v. Foster CA2/7