In re T.H.
Appellant challenges the decision of the juvenile court sustaining a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition against her on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient, a probation condition is vague, and the trial court erred by setting a maximum confinement term. Court concluded substantial evidence supports the court’s finding that appellant committed a robbery. Although the juvenile court eliminated any vagueness problem by adding a knowledge element to the probation condition in question, the minute order should be modified to conform. The court was not required to set a maximum confinement term because appellant was not removed from the physical custody of her mother. Although the term has no legal effect and does not prejudice appellant, the court agrees that it should be deleted from the minute order.
Comments on In re T.H.