legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.F. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant, R.V. (Mother), is the mother of five girls: B.B., born in 1999, R.E., born in 2000, D.D., born in 2004, S.D., born in 2013, and D.F., born in 2015. Defendant and appellant, R.D. (Father), is the father of two of the girls, D.D. and S.D. B.B., R.E., and D.F. have different fathers, and none of these fathers are parties to this appeal. Only the three older girls, R.E., B.B., and D.D., are subjects of this appeal.
Mother and Father each appeal from the March 21, 2017, dispositional orders for the three older girls. Mother claims insufficient evidence supports the jurisdictional findings for the three older girls, which were made pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (j) of section 300 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Father claims insufficient evidence supports the jurisdictional findings for his child, D.D., the youngest of the three older girls.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale