legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Krueger CA4/3
Appellant Christopher Krueger was convicted of possessing drugs and paraphernalia the police found in his bedroom during a probation search for his former girlfriend. On appeal, he contends the contraband was unlawfully seized, and his admissions to the police were involuntarily rendered. The Attorney General disagrees with these claims and maintains appellant should not even be allowed to raise them because he did not renew his suppression motion in the trial court. While we reject the Attorney General’s forfeiture argument, we agree with her on the merits and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale