In re A.M. CA5
Appellants Steven M. (father) and D.S. (mother) appealed from the juvenile court’s orders terminating their parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) as to their now three- and one-year-old sons, Adam and Stanley. After reviewing the juvenile court record, appellants’ court-appointed counsel informed this court they could find no arguable issues to raise on appellants’ behalf. This court granted appellants leave to personally file letters setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error exists. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844.)
Appellants filed a joint letter but failed to address the termination findings or orders or set forth a good cause showing that any arguable issue of reversible error arose from the section 366.26 hearing. (In re Phoenix H. (2009), 47 Cal.4th at p. 844.) Consequently, we dismiss the appeal.
Comments on In re A.M. CA5