Five Points Temescal v. Hathaway CA2/5
In 2013, defendant and appellant Merrie Hathaway (defendant) stipulated to an interlocutory judgment that partitioned real property she jointly owned with plaintiffs and respondents Five Points Temescal, LLC and Temescal Ranch Limited Partnership (plaintiffs), and with third party Hathaway Temescal, LLC (Hathaway). In 2016, the trial court confirmed the sale of the property, and defendant noticed this appeal from the order confirming the sale. Defendant’s contentions on appeal, however, primarily concern the earlier judgment of partition (or the complaint leading to that judgment)—which defendant did not timely appeal. We therefore conclude defendant presents no meritorious challenge to the order under review.
Comments on Five Points Temescal v. Hathaway CA2/5