Asselin-Normand v. America’s Best Value Inn CA3
In November 2016, appellant Jonathan Asselin-Normand, a 19-year-old proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against respondents America’s Best Value Inn Marysville and Anil Patel, alleging five causes of action based on respondents’ purported discriminatory practice of refusing to rent rooms to people under the age of 21. The complaint sought monetary, injunctive, and declaratory relief. Shortly after commencing this action, appellant filed an ex parte application for temporary restraining order and order to show cause re: preliminary injunction, seeking to enjoin respondents from enforcing their minimum age requirement for renting rooms. Respondents filed an opposition, arguing, among other things, appellant’s ex parte application should be denied because appellant failed to demonstrate any imminent danger or irreparable harm.
Comments on Asselin-Normand v. America’s Best Value Inn CA3