legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Haringa CA4/2
Ruth E. Haringa filed for legal separation from Rudy Haringa and, six years later, they entered into a stipulated judgment of dissolution that divided their community assets. Inter alia, the judgment allocated certain pieces of real property between Ruth and Rudy, awarded Rudy full ownership of two dairy businesses, and obligated him to make a $3,000,000 equalization payment to Ruth. Eleven years after the judgment was entered, Ruth requested, pursuant to Family Code section 2556, that the family court divide community assets that were omitted from or unadjudicated by the judgment. In particular, Ruth argued Rudy transferred ownership in certain dairy farms to his now-deceased brother before Ruth and Rudy separated, without Ruth’s knowledge and consent, and the community estate’s interest in those dairies was not adjudicated in the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale