legal news


Register | Forgot Password

A.M. v. Superior Court CA1/3
Petitioner A.M., Sr., father of A.M., Jr., challenges the juvenile court’s September 1, 2017 order terminating Father’s reunification services and setting a hearing, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 on the ground that he was not provided reasonable reunification services. Father contends that he began to exhibit signs of extreme mental illness during the review period, however the Agency failed to provide him with mental health services. Thus, according to Father, the services he was offered were deficient. For the reasons given below, we deny his petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale