Bisno v. Vineyards Development CA2/5
Plaintiff and appellant Robert H. Bisno appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants and respondents Vineyards Development Inc., Ryan Ogulnick, and VDB Santa Ana, LLC (VDB) after the court sustained respondents’ demurrer without leave to amend. Bisno contends his claims are not barred by the doctrines of claim preclusion or issue preclusion. Respondents argue the trial court correctly sustained their demurrer based on prior litigation that resulted in judgments adverse to Bisno’s company. We hold that the trial court correctly sustained the demurrer to all causes of action except for the eleventh, alleging quantum meruit for legal services. We affirm, except for that portion of the judgment sustaining the demurrer to the eleventh cause of action, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.
Comments on Bisno v. Vineyards Development CA2/5