legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.V. CA6
A.V., a teenaged, United States citizen, had been living with a nonparental relative in the United States before she voluntarily went to the Bill Wilson Center (BWC), and the Santa Clara County Department of Family and Children’s Services (Department) placed her in protective custody because of caretaker absence. The juvenile court determined that A.V. came within its jurisdiction under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b) (failure to protect) and subdivision (c) (serious emotional damage). Both parents, E.V. (father) and M.L. (mother), were living apart in Mexico. A.V. had not lived with father since February 2015, and she had not lived with mother since 2012. Mother requested custody of A.V. After a contested disposition hearing, the court declared A.V. to be a dependent child of the court and placed A.V. with mother, whom the court found to be the formerly noncustodial parent, under a family maintenance plan.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale