legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.S. CA1/2
O.H. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to her son, S.S. (Minor). Arguing that the court erred in not applying the relative placement preference at disposition, Mother asks us to order that Minor be placed in the home of his aunt T.S. Mother also argues that the juvenile court violated the inquiry and notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.), and that the matter should be remanded for compliance with ICWA. We conclude that Mother forfeited her claim of error as to relative placement by failing to raise the issue in the juvenile court, and that her ICWA claim has merit. Therefore, we will remand the matter for the limited purpose of compliance with ICWA.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale