Marriage of Fleming and Ackerman CA2/7
Both Erin Fleming and Michael Ackerman appeal from the judgment in their marital dissolution action. Fleming contends that the trial court erred when it awarded Ackerman a particular investment account as separate property; when it awarded the balance of a checking account to Ackerman; and when it reimbursed Ackerman the full amount of funds paid into escrow in conjunction with the purchase of a home. Ackerman challenges the orders requiring him to reimburse the community for his occupancy of the marital home after separation and to pay retroactive support, the court’s retention of jurisdiction over spousal support until mid-2018, and the division of funds in a retirement account. We modify the reimbursement award but otherwise affirm.
Comments on Marriage of Fleming and Ackerman CA2/7