P. v. Gomez CA1/4
Appellant David Anthony Gomez appeals a judgment entered upon his plea of no contest to possession of a nunchaku (Pen. Code, § 22010) and his admission that he had served three prior prison terms. (§ 667.5, subd. (b).) His appellate counsel has raised no issues and asks this court to independently review the record to determine whether there are any sentencing or other post-plea issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was notified of his right to personally file a supplemental brief, but he has not done so. We have reviewed the record, found no arguable issues, and therefore affirm the order.
Comments on P. v. Gomez CA1/4