Dray v. Revah CA2/4
Defendant Haim Revah appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to compel arbitration of a contractual loan dispute. Revah and plaintiff Alain Dray entered into a loan agreement that contained an arbitration provision. They subsequently signed a promissory note regarding the same loan; that document contained no reference to arbitration. Dray sued for breach of the promissory note and Revah moved to compel arbitration. The trial court denied arbitration, finding that the terms of the later agreement superseded the original contract. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion and affirm.
Comments on Dray v. Revah CA2/4