Bliven v. Locasio CA6
Appellant Brian Bliven seeks review of the superior court’s grant of a motion in limine for judgment on the pleadings in favor of respondents John and Marcello LoCascio and their auto body repair business, Union Jack. Appellant contends that the court should not have granted judgment on the pleadings based on a settlement agreement without assuming the truth of the facts pleaded in his first amended complaint. We agree with appellant that the facts alleged in appellant’s complaint were sufficient to preclude judgment on the pleadings in this procedural context. Accordingly, we must reverse.
Comments on Bliven v. Locasio CA6