legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Rivera CA6
While on parole, defendant Miguel Angel Rivera fired a gun at a shooting range on three occasions. Video footage of two of those visits was posted on defendant’s public Facebook page. Also posted on that page were several photographs that a gang expert opined were gang-related. A jury convicted defendant of three counts of possessing a firearm as a felon. (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1).) Gang enhancements were alleged for two of those counts, and the jury found both true. (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(A).) In defendant’s original briefing, he contends there was insufficient evidence to support the gang enhancements because there were no indicia of gang activity in the videos that were posted online. In a supplemental opening brief, defendant argues the trial court erred by allowing the prosecution’s gang expert to discuss case-specific, testimonial hearsay in violation of the principles articulated in People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665 (Sanchez).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale