P. v. Pasillas CA1/2
Defendant Roberto Pasillas appeals an order directing him to pay $6,995 in victim restitution for a car he stole and subsequently totaled when he attempted to evade the police. He contends the court erred in setting the amount of restitution at the price the owner had listed the car for sale rather than the owner’s acquisition and carrying costs. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting the restitution amount, and thus affirm.
Comments on P. v. Pasillas CA1/2