P. v. Watkins CA4/1
On appeal, Watkins contends the trial court erred by failing to also instruct the jury regarding involuntary manslaughter and the heat-of-passion theory of voluntary manslaughter. He also contends the trial court erred by excluding evidence of prior incidents during which George and Christopher allegedly became belligerent when drinking alcohol together. We find no error, and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Watkins CA4/1