Montazer v. Montazer CA4/3
The trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to the complaint filed by plaintiff and appellant, Parviz Montazer (husband), against defendant and respondent, Parvin R. Montazer (wife). The court ruled jurisdiction over the matter resided in the family court and the complaint failed to state a cause of action.
Husband argues the trial court had jurisdiction, the complaint stated a cause of action, and he should have been allowed to amend the pleading. He also claims the case should not have been dismissed because he had good cause for not attending the order to show cause (OSC) re dismissal.
We agree the court lacked jurisdiction and properly dismissed the action. Consequently we have no need to discuss any other arguments. We affirm.
Comments on Montazer v. Montazer CA4/3