In re X.C. CA2/1
A.D. (Mother) appeals from the dependency court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders, as well as the order terminating jurisdiction and the exit order, entered at the six month review hearing, granting R.C., Sr. (Father) sole legal custody over their children, X.C., R.C., Jr., and P.C. Among the multiple issues raised on appeal, some of which are moot given the termination of the dependency jurisdiction, Mother contends that the dependency court should not have exercised jurisdiction because insufficient evidence supported the jurisdictional findings and disposition order, and because the tribal court of Mother’s Indian tribe in Arizona had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter. In addition, Mother argues that the court abused its discretion when it entered an exit order awarding Father sole legal custody of the children. As we explain, Mother’s contentions lack merit, and accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on In re X.C. CA2/1