In re C.F. CA6
A.F. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional order directing him to submit to hair follicle drug testing as part of his reunification plan. He argues the test constitutes an invasion of privacy and is unrelated to his reunification with his children. As we explain below, we disagree. Given father’s history of drug use, requiring a hair follicle drug test was both reasonable and supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.
Comments on In re C.F. CA6