Stanley v. California Highway Patrol CA3
Following entry of judgment against him, plaintiff and appellant Kenneth Stanley challenges the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants and respondents California Highway Patrol (CHP), Steve Ramos, Jason Reardon, Dane Lobb, B. O’Keefe, B.J. Whitten, Matthew Otterby, and Heidi Carroll. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in excluding evidence, and in awarding summary adjudication as to his claims for defamation, harassment, negligence, and for violating the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act (the Bane Act; Civ. Code, § 52.1). We shall affirm the judgment.
Comments on Stanley v. California Highway Patrol CA3