legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.K. CA4/2
By appeal and by writ of habeas corpus, appellant M.R. (mother) appeals from a juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights as to her children, K.K., Y.K., and L.K. (the children). In her appeal, she contends: (1) her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the court’s order denying her reunification services under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(6); (2) the court erred in summarily denying her section 388 petition; and (3) the beneficial parental relationship exception applied (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)). Appellant R.K. (father) has filed a separate brief, joining in mother’s arguments and contending that, if this court reverses the order terminating her parental rights, the order terminating his parental rights must likewise be reversed. We reverse and remand.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale