Guillen v. City of Gardena CA2/4
Appellant Juan Guillen challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents. He argues the court incorrectly ruled that the evidence compendium he submitted was untimely and refused to consider it. We conclude that, even considering the improperly excluded evidence, appellant has not made a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief; hence the court’s error was harmless. We affirm.
Comments on Guillen v. City of Gardena CA2/4