legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Martinelli CA1/1
In this appeal, counsel for appellant has filed a declaration stating she has reviewed the record in the matter and decided to file a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Her presentation of the matter is unique in that she presents several legal arguments on possible issues in the case and, for the most part, proceeds to discount them with legal authority. She has written appellant and advised him of her conclusion to file a Wende brief. She advised appellant he may file a supplemental brief with this court raising any issues he believes need to be addressed. More than 30 days have passed and no supplemental brief has by filed by appellant. We have reviewed the record and conclude the judgment should be affirmed. The appeal is timely.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale