D and S Homes v. Ludlow CA2/5
Defendant and appellant Jeffrey Ludlow (Ludlow) prevailed on an anti-SLAPP motion to strike plaintiff and respondent D and S Homes’ (D&S’s) complaint alleging Ludlow and other defendants maliciously prosecuted a lawsuit against D&S. We consider whether the trial court abused its discretion determining a reasonable attorney fee for prevailing in the anti-SLAPP litigation was $61,250 (crediting 175 hours of work at $350 per hour), notwithstanding Ludlow’s request for $242,585 (seeking credit for 693.1 hour of work at $350 per hour).
Comments on D and S Homes v. Ludlow CA2/5