legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Nay v. Hudson
Appellant is one of two beneficiaries of the inter vivos trust of his deceased mother. Following the filing of the trustee’s first account, appellant objected to several items in the account, including the size of the trustee’s fees and the payment of certain attorney fees. The probate court found merit in some of appellant’s arguments and required a partial reimbursement of fees by both the trustee and her attorneys. The probate court also surcharged the trustee for costs associated with the late payment of estate taxes. Appellant now contends that the probate court should have required even greater reimbursements. Finding no abuse of discretion in the probate court’s order, the court affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale