legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Corbin CA2/4
In the underlying proceeding, appellant James William Corbin, representing himself, was convicted of indecent exposure under Penal Code section 314. Appellant’s principal contention is that the trial court committed reversible error after determining during pretrial proceedings that appellant’s 1983 conviction for indecent exposure was an element of the offense charged against him. Appellant maintains that due to the error, his 1983 conviction for indecent exposure was improperly disclosed to the jury. Additionally, appellant contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence of other prior acts of indecent exposure. We conclude that appellant has forfeited his contentions relating to the 1983 conviction, and that he has shown no error regarding the other prior acts of indecent exposure. We therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale