Marriage of Tresp CA4/1
Appellant Brian Tresp appeals from an order dividing the proceeds of a sale of real property previously owned by Tresp and his former wife, Julie Griech. On appeal, Tresp claims that the trial court erred in determining that Griech did not transmute her interest in the real property to Tresp.
The record on appeal does not contain Griech's "Request for Order" pursuant to which the court found that Griech did not transmute her interest in the property. The record on appeal also does not contain the declarations that Griech offered in support of her request, nor several of the exhibits that she lodged with the declarations. The record also does not contain a full reporter's transcript of the hearings pursuant to which the court found that Griech did not transmute her interest in the property. The law is clear that where an appellant does not provide an adequate record to permit review of the merits of his claim, a reviewing court must affirm the order at issue.
Comments on Marriage of Tresp CA4/1